Commercial Property

20th July 2017

Tenants Security of Tenure

Tenants Security of Tenure under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

This Act provides the statutory regime under which commercial tenants (usually) have a right to renew their tenancy at the end of the contractual term.

The tenant can therefore often require the landlord to grant a further lease on similar terms to the existing lease unless the landlord can take advantage of some of the exceptions in the Act. These exceptions are however very narrow (provided that the tenant has been complying with its lease covenants) and often the landlord has to pay compensation to the tenant even if the landlord can exercise them.

For this reason many landlords require their tenant to contract out of these provisions. This now involves a system of serving a formal notice on the prospective tenant at the outset of the lease. The tenant then needs to sign a declaration confirming that he is prepared to take a lease without the usual statutory protection. Unless a statutory declaration is used there will need to be a 14 day cooling off period between the service of the notice and the signing of the declaration / lease completion.

Where a tenant has the protection of the Act the landlord will need to serve at least 6 months written notice on the tenant prior to termination of the lease. This notice (usually called a “Section 25 Notice”) either contains details of the landlords proposals for any renewal lease or states the exceptions that the landlord is intending to exercise to avoid the requirement to grant a new lease.

The Act is convoluted and both landlord and tenant need to be aware that failure to meet with the formalities and requisite deadlines can easily have serious consequences. Even where these are complied with, court proceedings to determine new lease terms (where a tenant is enforcing its right to renew) or determine the landlord’s exercise of the exceptions are sometimes necessary.

Landlords therefore need to be careful that they do not rush into granting a lease to a commercial tenant without considering whether or not they are actually prepared to let the property on what may, in effect, be a permanent basis.

From the tenants’ perspective they should not agree to contract out without considering what might happen at the end of the term. Potentially the Tenant stands to loose the goodwill they may have built up at those premises and possibly even some value to their stock and equipment, if they have to leave the premises at the end of the term. It may also allow the Landlord to negotiate any new rent under a proposed new lease from a position of greater strength.

Given these competing interests between landlord and tenant it is often an important item to be discussed during lease negotiations and established in the Heads of Terms.

This is a complex area and both parties should take specific legal advice. This note is merely a very basic guide and the applicability of the Act to a particular lease will vary depending on it’s terms and surrounding circumstances.

For more information on this contact James Turner

Testimonials

Jamie Dobbs FCILEx

"I should like to take this opportunity to express my very sincere and grateful thanks for Jamie's unfailing helpfulness and efficiency in all aspects of the handling of my late stepmother's estate. Jamie have always replied to my (many!) queries promptly and comprehensively which has been a enormous help throughout what I know can be a fraught and stressful process. Sadly, it is increasingly rare these days to experience the highs standards of service that Jamie has provided."

Gemma Mayer LLB

"I would highly recommend Maples Solicitors, especially Gemma Mayer, for any conveyancing work. The level of support and professionalism was excellent at all times. I also felt if I needed to ask or clarify anything that it was not an issue. Buying and selling a house is stressful enough, but Gemma helped me through it step by step."

Anita Toal LLB BA

"I think you are brilliant. You can use my comments above. You are efficient, friendly and quite clearly very good at what you do. Mainly you don’t leave people hanging around too long for." "So easy to talk to her and she understood what I wanted. She put me at ease and I cant thank her enough"

James Turner BA

James Turner was extremely helpful with our buying process. Everything went smoothly. We are very happy with the level of professionalism demonstrated by the office. Highly recommended solicitors. Will definitely do business with them again.

Daven Naghen LLB

"Daven provided an excellent service, from attending the first interview with me to the final court appearance. He filled me full of confidence that he would defend me to which he did and come out with an excellent outcome in view of my position that I had put myself in."

Faye Blair LLB

Faye was excellent, sensitive and acted very well to the time constraints we faced. Great service and dealt with compassion at such sad times made the process less painful very professional.

Jamie Dobbs GCILEx

Over the last forty years I have cause to deal with many law firms both in a personal and professional capacity, including some ‘top’ London Companies. In all of those dealings I have never found anyone as proactive and so willing to offer help and advice as Jamie Dobbs. During the last two years Jamie guided my parents through the completion of Lasting Powers of Attorney. Helped myself with the use of the LPA and recently dealing with Probate and Estate Administration following their death.

Mike Pepper MA

Mike Pepper gave us excellent advice. He was always most helpful and accommodating giving lucid explanations every step of the way. Thank you Mike.

Donna Sandison FCILEx

Donna has been helpful and professional every step of the way during the process. Always on hand to answer any queries and totally professional and friendly at all times.